<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Duke Energy protest&#160;preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cltblog.com/2883/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cltblog.com/2883</link>
	<description>Crown Town brown cow; we blog the Queen City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:34:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RhiBowman</title>
		<link>http://cltblog.com/2883#comment-1019</link>
		<dc:creator>RhiBowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cltblog.com/?p=2883#comment-1019</guid>
		<description>Great question, Justin. I think the answer is &quot;both.&quot; We can&#039;t take ourselves out of the equation. 
 
Yesterday afternoon I asked Grant Smith if raising energy rates would encourage people to pay more attention to their energy consumption. His response is included above. He talked about how expensive it is to build coal and nuclear plants and how it&#039;s less expensive it is to fund solar and wind projects that can start contributing to the grid much faster. 
 
In his opinion, old-style energy companies are doing things the way they&#039;ve always done them because that&#039;s the way to the bank and that the money for projects like Cliffside could be put to better use if it were redirected toward renewable sources. He said using renewable sources will not raise consumers&#039; bills but that building new, yet antiquated, plants will. 
 
He did not talk about using less energy, but that could be because our conversation was cut short. 
 
I&#039;m going to the protest today and will ask the protesters about their own energy usage. It&#039;s something we should all be conscious about, something all of us can actively participate in -- at no cost -- starting now. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question, Justin. I think the answer is &quot;both.&quot; We can&#039;t take ourselves out of the equation. </p>
<p>Yesterday afternoon I asked Grant Smith if raising energy rates would encourage people to pay more attention to their energy consumption. His response is included above. He talked about how expensive it is to build coal and nuclear plants and how it&#039;s less expensive it is to fund solar and wind projects that can start contributing to the grid much faster. </p>
<p>In his opinion, old-style energy companies are doing things the way they&#039;ve always done them because that&#039;s the way to the bank and that the money for projects like Cliffside could be put to better use if it were redirected toward renewable sources. He said using renewable sources will not raise consumers&#039; bills but that building new, yet antiquated, plants will. </p>
<p>He did not talk about using less energy, but that could be because our conversation was cut short. </p>
<p>I&#039;m going to the protest today and will ask the protesters about their own energy usage. It&#039;s something we should all be conscious about, something all of us can actively participate in &#8212; at no cost &#8212; starting now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Ruckman</title>
		<link>http://cltblog.com/2883#comment-1018</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Ruckman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cltblog.com/?p=2883#comment-1018</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a really important point, I think -- about how Duke&#039;s energy production methods are a function of our own demand. Are we protesting Duke, or are we protesting our own (currently) unsustainable hunger for energy? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s a really important point, I think &#8212; about how Duke&#039;s energy production methods are a function of our own demand. Are we protesting Duke, or are we protesting our own (currently) unsustainable hunger for energy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jritch</title>
		<link>http://cltblog.com/2883#comment-1017</link>
		<dc:creator>jritch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cltblog.com/?p=2883#comment-1017</guid>
		<description>Riverbend Steam Station and Buck Steam Station in Spencer are amazing pieces of history.  
 
On the top level of Riverbend, there is an old room made out of old, rich wood. It&#039;s where teams of workers spent their days moving coal from bins into a moving belt. It was like I could feel the sacrifices made by those people. Industrial society has a dirty history but I was truly in awe standing in that place, contemplating the sacrifices those people made. 
 
Duke&#039;s hydro stations are even older, like Ninety-Nine Islands in SC which went online in 1910, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flopeye.net/story.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.flopeye.net/story.htm&lt;/a&gt; 
 
The company relied on hydro until the mid-50s when air conditioners became the norm. That&#039;s when Duke transitioned from being a hydro company to a fossil company.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Riverbend Steam Station and Buck Steam Station in Spencer are amazing pieces of history.  </p>
<p>On the top level of Riverbend, there is an old room made out of old, rich wood. It&#039;s where teams of workers spent their days moving coal from bins into a moving belt. It was like I could feel the sacrifices made by those people. Industrial society has a dirty history but I was truly in awe standing in that place, contemplating the sacrifices those people made. </p>
<p>Duke&#039;s hydro stations are even older, like Ninety-Nine Islands in SC which went online in 1910, <a href="http://www.flopeye.net/story.htm" target="_blank">http://www.flopeye.net/story.htm</a> </p>
<p>The company relied on hydro until the mid-50s when air conditioners became the norm. That&#039;s when Duke transitioned from being a hydro company to a fossil company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

